Talk:Lawdex

16 April 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Is this page similar enough to other pages describing companies to be of use to the readership? I attempted to be neutral and factual. Certainly a lot more could be written about the companies involved in the electronic transformation of the legal industry. Thanks. Keep up the good work. Lawlalaw 05:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I was researching Lawdex and found this page. It seems to be informative and not blatant advertising to me. Information like this is valuable to the legal community researching e-filing vendors. Fermatavino 03:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would hope that a law firm would not be using Wikipedia to find e-filing vendors. hbdragon88 06:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lawdex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]