Talk:Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconPennsylvania Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics: Political parties Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Office holders

There is an office holders section despite no listed officials. Either this section should be removed, or the officials should be cataloged here. PickleG13 (talk) 02:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Libertarian Party.svg

The image

requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation
linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keystone

A faction of the party has split off to form a new party, the

Keystone Party of Pennsylvania. I originally noted this in the succeeded section in the infobox with the preface faction as per every other political party that has had factions split off from it. I believe that this should be included in the infobox and am wondering why it got reverted. Scu ba (talk) 23:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Can you provide examples of that being the case for other extant parties? It seems inappropriate to say the LPPA was "succeeded by" anything when it still exists.
talk) 23:58, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]