Talk:Liberty Hill, Texas

Austin Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liberty Hill, Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Liberty Hill, Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://factfinder2.census.gov/
• Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:50, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies, I noticed that you re-added the paragraph about football championship win that another editor removed.

Would it be better placed on the article page for the high school?

If its going to stay, I'll note that they also won the following year in 3A DI according to https://www.texasfootball.com/records/ Tacitusmd (talk) 07:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Tacitusmd, it's not a big deal to me. You need to look at this in context: I was following the many unexplained and sometimes destructive edits by User:TheG3NERAL John 3:16, and restoring the bit that was actually verified. Sure, it's probably better in the high school article, if there is one, no doubt--and I am sure that if you do that, you'll explain that in an edit summary, unlike the other editor. Thanks for the note, Drmies (talk) 12:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I do appreciate the context. Just to be clear, I'm not trying to give you a hard time or anything (and sorry if it came across that way). I noticed both the link and the archive link for cite weren't working so dived in a little deeper and noticed they won a second time but for D1 instead of D2 the next year. Got me also wondering if the high school had an article and found that it does. I thought you might be a football fan since you added it back to the article and might be able to provide some insight into if the D1 win is also notable enough to mention and if it so would it be worth killing two birds with one stone kind of thing. Cheers. :) Tacitusmd (talk) 12:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]