Talk:Life Safety Code

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Firefighting Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firefighting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to firefighting on Wikipedia! If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.FirefightingWikipedia:WikiProject FirefightingTemplate:WikiProject FirefightingFirefighting articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Like all consensus codes, the LSC is a living document. After the Station Nightclub fire, there were immediate changes made as temporary interim amendments, subsequently adopted in the 2006 code. Would it be useful to summarize some of the important changes for each version (2006, 2009, etc)? Lupinelawyer (talk) 18:40, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The "Current code" section contained a spurious table referenced to something well outside of the Life Safety Code and which appears nowhere in the code itself. NFPA 101 contains numerous references to OTHER codes for testing and rating materials but has no flame rating standards of its own.Lupinelawyer (talk) 00:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Life Safety Code. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928060024/http://www.nfpa.org/assets/images/NFPA101AdoptionMap.gif to http://www.nfpa.org/assets/images/NFPA101AdoptionMap.gif

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]