Talk:Liquid Candy

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink: Beverages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Related taskforces: /  This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here . Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

I think this article should be merged into the authoring group, Center for Science in the Public Interest. There's evidence of a spate of news coverage and influence following its release, but I struggle to see how that warrants a white paper having its own article independent of the advocacy group that wrote it. WhinyTheYounger ※ Talk 23:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

merge - agree it makes more sense and CSPI page is not so long that it warrants splitting off into separate article Superb Owl (talk) 06:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]