Talk:List of European Union regions by GDP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Misleading title

The title should not say "European regions", because one would expect e. g. Switzerland to be included. --Nczempin (talk) 08:16, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It does have none-EU states like Norway and Macedonia in it. So anything else (i.e. EU-regions) would seem even more missleading. Many European regions in Moldova, Russia etc. would never be included due to a lack of data - why it can never have all of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hokrollo (talkcontribs) 11:37, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The absence of Switzerland and the UK would make the title very misleading. 79.66.51.226 (talk) 00:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source is possibly outdated

The source links to a "not found" page at Eurostat. Possibly outdated or simply moved. Nethertheless it seems vital for the ability to confirm the information of this wiki.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on

List of European regions by GDP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ
for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unassigned GDP

It is a bit silly that more than half of Poland's GDP is unassigned .. this makes it look like an anomaly and slashes it far further down the statistical tables than it realistically should be, it is thus misleading. Should every region be doubled?

Britain is also partly misleading through it's large unassigned GDP (presumably this is both down to finance and capital) ... it is rather disingenuous to attempt to show that parts of Britain are poorer than rural Romania. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PanthWiki (talkcontribs) 23:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A related issue. Cost of living (thus PPS) in Extremadura is far cheaper than in Catalonia or Madrid, say. Yet the PPS correction is applied across the board for Spain (and I suppose, for each country), giving a falsified outcome. Mstrubell (talk) 10:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Current list NUTS

https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/8700651/1-28022018-BP-EN/15f5fd90-ce8b-4927-9a3b-07dc255dc42a Xx236 (talk) 08:53, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Europe is a continent, not a conglomerate of some coin invented to beat the dollar or the yen.

Turkey, the UK, all belong to the continent of Europe. For some ridiculous reason you've excluded them from this list. Europe is not "the EU". My kid in school learns that Great Britain is part of Europe, and it still is. As is Turkey.