This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
The guideline specifies that the list should be limited to notable awards, not awards from notable organizations. Notable radio stations, magazines, labor unions, white separatist organizations, blogs, people, etc. exist and often have "awards" that are not in any way noteworthy.
A notable award is (usually) going to be noteworthy. If, however, an organization is notable, awards from that organization do not inherit that notability. At the moment, I am notable. If I nominate films on my blog or notable employer's website, does that award go here? Of course not. Virtually no one would care. I'm notable (barely). My employer is notable. The award is not. - SummerPhDv2.0 19:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel particular critics groups don't meet notability guidelines, then take it to
WP:MOSFILM. - Brojam (talk) 05:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
Two problems here: 1) Organizations with articles often issue awards which do not have articles. The guideline says the award must be notable. 2) The guideline does not say that every award with an article should be included. - SummerPhDv2.0 13:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is there some particular award you are objecting to? Spanneraol (talk) 13:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's well beyond one award and well beyond this article. The current posterboy for the issue is the
AARP's Movies for Grownups Awards. AARP is notable. The award is not. If you are nominated for an Oscar, the New York Times wants an interview, your agent ups your price and every bio of you is updated to reflect that you are no longer an actress, you are an "Oscar-nominated actress". If you are nominated for the AARP's Movies for Grownups Awards, your mom cuts out the clipping from AARP magazine and your local paper runs a "local girl makes good" article. There's certainly room in between. our MOS uses the existence of a non-redirect article for the award as one determining factor as to which to include and which to ignore. - SummerPhDv2.0 16:12, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
]
I get your point but i think that discussion needs to be somewhere else. Spanneraol (talk) 16:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
