Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Paramore

Starting out

Alright. Basically this page was constructed based on the text removed in this edit. Now as you'll see, not everything made it through. Stuff like the 2009 Kerrang! Best 100 Rock Videos really isn't worthy of note on Wikipedia, and accounts for little more than

trivia. This is a list of actually notable awards. If you want to add something, please make sure it's worthy of inclusion, and stick to the format on the page. And going forward, all edits should have a reference. I'm going to try to backfill the references on here in the coming days. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Notable and non-notable awards

So Para.Leaf has repeatedly included a number of awards that I think don't belong here, and has removed others that do.

The Kerrang! Awards are notable. They have their own article and are controlled by the editors of the magazine. The Kerrang! Reader's Poll awards, by comparison, aren't.lead singer of Paramore won is irrelevant; this list is about the band, not the people in the band. An award she won goes on her article.
These "Miscellaneous awards and honors" just don't belong because they're
fancruft
, and Wi. Being #20 in Spin Magazine Best 09 – Top 40 Albums doesn't need to be listed here. Further, this is a list where either they won an award or were nominated, so to that end, top N lists are irrelevant.

Look.

WP:INDISCRIMINATE

says something "merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia." This article isn't meant to glorify the band by listing every single award that they ever won. It's meant to be a list of notable awards put out by reliable sources.

I'll clarify a bit more. There's a category for awards like this - Category:Lists of awards by musician. A glance at any of the articles in there shows that only won/nominated awards belong, and top N lists aren't mentioned at all. Actually it seems that the criteria for inclusion is whether or not there's an article for the award (e.g. Grammy Awards vs. Spin Magazine Best 09 – Top 40 Albums). — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 22:36, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per the discussion with myself, I've linked the titles of the sections. I think that should be the criteria for notability - whether or not the awards themselves are notable (i.e. have their own article.) — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 02:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots

|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101024175524/http://www.kerrang.com:80/blog/2010/07/and_the_winners_are_1.html to http://www.kerrang.com/blog/2010/07/and_the_winners_are_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 03:14, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of awards and nominations received by Paramore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]