Talk:List of books and publications related to the hippie subculture

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Bibliographies ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Sociology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Books

Each work needs to clearly indicate at the main article their relationship with hippie culture, otherwise this is original research. its pretty good original research, most of these at first glance are definitely associated with the culture. needs to be made encyclopedic as much as can be.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the section "miscellaneous" is obviously not that: i just havent sorted the list out yet.76.252.223.197 (talk) 04:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

sorting done. its still very much OR as it stands, but i believe all of this can be documented, thus eliminating the OR. removed some items with very little notability.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:18, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some lists of books have been added to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. You can find the discussions here. RockMagnetist (talk) 22:26, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

to the Current nonfiction about the subculture section and it seems to me that some sort of organization of that section, and all of them for that matter, is in order. It could be alphabetized by author (my choice), by title or even chronologically, but something need to happen. Also, what is a useable definition of the word "current" as used here? Post 2000? Post Hippie era? Something else? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 22:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

with the same observation that the sections need to be arranged in something other than psychological order, I thinking by author's last name, so I think when I get home later, that's what I'm going to start. Carptrash (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]