Talk:List of educational institutions in Nagpur

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. India: Maharashtra / Education Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Education in India workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

As stated at Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists, Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#Adding individual items to a list:-

1. All lists must have clearly defined inclusion criteria
2. Every entry should meet the
   indiscriminate lists
   , and prevents individual lists from being too large to be useful to readers.
3. Editors may, at their discretion,
   choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles
   .
4. All list entries must follow Wikipedia's
   Neutral point of view

This list fails most of these requirements in that:-

• There are no clearly defined inclusion criteria
• Many of the entries are not "verifiably a member of the list" in that they have neither an article nor a reference
• As per the above rules, all redlinks, without a citation, should be removed
• Redlinks with a citation, should only remain if it is "reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming". (although how this can/should be assessed is unclear)
• Personally, I would like to avoid this indeterminable criteria and "limit the list to entries with a Wikipedia articles", and delete all redlinks - as point 3 above and most other similar lists - but that is a matter for consensus.
• I invite comments on the elimination of all redlinks, but will remove redlinks, without citations, as per the above rationale
• If there are no reasoned objections, say within 3 months, I will remove the remaining redlinks - Arjayay (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]