Talk:List of highest-grossing Malayalam films

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2023

Insert Romancham as the 8th highest grossing mollywood movie in place of Hridayam. 27.57.16.40 (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 13:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/malayalam/movies/box-office/romancham-box-office-collection-soubin-shahirs-film-crosses-rs-64-crores/articleshow/98600092.cms Deepak20002075 (talk) 19:22, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lower limit

If we are going to list out movies that have grossed the highest, then, IMO, a lower limit should be set. Either we can go for movies which have grossed 50 crores or above, or top 20 ot 25 movies, like other highest grossing lists. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald:: 50 cr is a good limit also need to add the top grossing movies prior to 2000 and some records like biggest open day collection, milestones etc. AleksiB 1945 (talk) 07:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 February 2024

രാജീവൻ1024 (talk) 04:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Malikappuram movie collection 100crore

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jamedeus (talk) 04:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4 March 2024

I am writing this cause 2 movies listed here Manjummel Boys and Premalu are in wrong positions so I have to fix them Editorial editor 11 (talk) 13:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a
"change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2024

The data is wrong for 2nd and 3rd top movies.

For (2) it's 144.5Cr not 175Cr For (3) it's 128.5Cr not 152Cr

Please CHANGE: 2 Lucifer 2019 Prithviraj Sukumaran Aashirvad Cinemas ₹175 crore (US$24.85 million)

3 Pulimurugan 2016 Vysakh Mulakuppadam Films ₹152 crore (US$22.62 million)

TO: 2 Lucifer 2019 Prithviraj Sukumaran Aashirvad Cinemas ₹144.5 crore (US$20.5 million)

3 Pulimurugan 2016 Vysakh Mulakuppadam Films ₹128.5 crore (US$19.2 million)

Reference IMDB Link: https://m.imdb.com/list/ls092118044/ Tariqm7 (talk) 09:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:06, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manjummel boys

Manjummel boys collected ₹146 crore 2409:4073:4DCF:ED5D:0:0:1549:C00E (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2024

Manjummel Boys is now the highest grossing malayalam movie. StanleyJr33 (talk) 11:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2024

Manjummel Boys became the first malayalam movie to surpass 200 crore 2409:40F2:14F:95B1:7403:D482:D2E7:3BEE (talk) 13:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I added this to the lead, thanks. Jamedeus (talk) 17:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kayamkulam Kochunni and Madhura Raja

what is the total box office collection of both of these films? their Wikipedia page specifies that both the films gained over 100 crs. whats the true numbers? shouldn't the table be updated if its actually over 100 crs? Credmaster 20 (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Premalu,Lucifer box office error

Here I want to request to update that the movie 'Lucifer' box office collection is given as 127cr,whereas it is actually 128cr you can check it's official wikipedia page and 'Premalu' box office is given as 135 cr when it is actually 135.51cr, you can check it's official wikipedia page ,please check and change lucifer's box office from 127 to 128cr and premalu's box office from 135 to 135.51 cr. Though this change is small, it is important. Thank You YoMe1234 (talk) 10:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 00:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2024

I want to state that in this list the box office collection for premalu is not updated yet as it is given as 135cr whereas it's actual box office is 135.82cr</ref>| gross= ₹135.82crore<ref"'Premalu' Box Office Collections Day 59: Mamitha Baiju's Comedy Flick Collects Rs 31Lakhs'". Times of India (in eng). 2024-03-22.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)</ref>}}

Please fix it as soon as possible. Thank you.

}} YoMe1234 (talk) 08:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bramayugam's Collection

Bramayugam's 85 Crore collection is its total business, not the theatrical collection. The references already provided are hence inadequate as none point out that 85 Crore is actually from its World wide theatrical run. All other movies in the list is ranked based on their theatrical collection, While Bramayugam's figure is its total business which includes ott and overseas rights. The actual figure is 58.70 Crores.[1] The same mistake can be seen in Bramayugam's wikipedia page as well. If the film actually made 85 crores solely from the box office, then the business collection would have surpassed 100 crores easily and that news would be all over social media (like Neru and Bheeshma Parvam) while none can be seen. So please look into it. Thank You. 59.89.231.250 (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Times of India is not a reliable source per
WP:ICTFSOURCES. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
I will add six more sources [2] [3] [4] [5] [6][7]. and a video that explains it. [8] In the currently provided sources, the only "reliable" source onmanorama is not stating whether the 85 crores is total business or box office collection and the article is not dedicated about bramayugam either, so it's only a passive mention with no further details. The other one provided definitely is an unreliable source, if TOI is not considered as a reliable one. My question about why 100 crores total business of Bramayugam has never made it to any news or is not shared by the makers of the film still stands. The answer is simple, the movie has never made it to the 100 crores in business collection (which is 85 crores). So please make the necessary corrections. Thank You. 59.89.231.250 (talk) 10:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the sources, but only OTTplay is good source from the list you provided. Others are either blogs or
WP:ICTFSOURCES, we can see. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
All these new sources I believe are reliable and I have seen zeenews in your list provided [9] [10] [11] plus OTTplay link that I have already submitted would prove my point. Even without these I think it's a nobrainer that Bramayugam's theatre collection is nowhere near 85 Crores and I hope you've already got the logic. I also would like to reiterate that onmanorama's article doesn't prove what the 85 crore figure is. Thank You. 59.89.231.250 (talk) 12:11, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Malikappuram's Collection is controversial

Both of the citations provided for Malikappuram's collection was based on 2023 articles that were reporting what the producer Venu Kunnappilly claimed. He has made these sorta 100 crore claims on his previous movie Mamangam as well, with no credibility. Manorama in a 2024 article wrote that only five movies have officially got into the 100 crore clubs and movies like Kuruppu, Madhura raja, Kayamkulam Kochunni, Malikappuram etc have been claimed by the makers (without any credible sources). [1] The latest 2024 article as a result supersedes all other articles before it. It is also clear from the article that Manorama doesn't endorse these other movies in the 100 crore club. This same movie was removed from the wiki list a few months back for the same reason. These kinds of changes are also affecting the credibility of this wiki page. So please remove Malikappuram from the list. Thank You. 117.255.182.189 (talk) 07:14, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pulimurugan BO collection

@

don't edit war, and consider this as a 3RR warning to both. Thanks and happy editing. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The websites that @Tusk001 has cited as references (except Mint & Kerala Kaumudi) have mentioned the movie's collection as 137–144 CR in their recent articles. The movie's total is unclear and may even go below the 135 CR mark <ref>{{Cite web |title=Pulimurugan collection by PinkVilla |url=https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/box-office/top-grossing-malayalam-films-of-all-time-tovino-thomas-set-to-top-mohanlal-2018-pulimurugan-lucifer-1221353 }}</ref>. Providing articles, which I have mentioned above Ds1480 (talk) 09:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PinkVilla = https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertainment/box-office/top-grossing-malayalam-films-of-all-time-tovino-thomas-set-to-top-mohanlal-2018-pulimurugan-lucifer-1221353
Asianet News = https://www.asianetnews.com/entertainment/box-office/top-grossing-malayalam-stars-film-at-rest-of-india-box-office-report-out-mohanlal-pulimurugan-tovino-2018-hrk-s6mlba
News18 = https://www.news18.com/movies/manjummel-boys-becomes-1st-malayalam-film-to-cross-rs-200-crore-8822388.html
TIE = https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/malayalam/manjummel-boys-inches-closer-to-rs-200-cr-mark-globally-50-cr-in-tamil-nadu-9218992/lite/
Zee News(Malayalam) = https://zeenews.india.com/malayalam/movies/2018-movie-beats-pulimurugan-collection-record-malayalam-multi-starrer-film-becomes-new-industry-hit-after-seven-years-140403 Ds1480 (talk) 09:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tusk001 Hopefully, you have read the references I have given above. If you haven't, please read it asap, so we can reach a conclusion without violating any more Wikipedia protocols. Ds1480 (talk) 11:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've read the articles, and it would have been great if you also read them properly.
The Asianet News article you mentioned states that 'Puli Murugan' has grossed "more than" 144 crore.
The article on News18 mentions that they relied on information from the Cue Studio page, which is notconsidered reliable.
Similarly, The Indian Express article also sourced box office figures from Cue and mentioned they took collection figures from Sacnik also , which are generally considered unreliable.
Lastly, the Zee News article referenced collection figures from a Twitter post on Forum Keralam, which is undoubtedly unreliable.
It seems we can reach a conclusion based on the details I have added. Tusk001 (talk) 12:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Tusk001 here.
MOS:FILM. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Ds1480 (talk) 16:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if I have sent this already. My Wikipedia is being weird these days, so my replies isn't visible for me :/ Ds1480 (talk) 16:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any official figure available from the movie team, apart from the 150 cr poster by the producer?
If there is any available, can you provide it? Ds1480 (talk) 16:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
After going through the page history and talk pages, I could see Pulimurugan BO's been the source of multiple edit wars. So, I'll do a detailed source analysis sometime this week and will post my suggestions here, as well as on the main article talk page. In the meantime, you may collect sources that are reliable and help out by posting them here. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So, should I straight up remove everything I see that uses Filmibeat as its source?
P.S. Idk why my replies aren't going through. Sorry In advance, if this one also gets chopped up. Ds1480 (talk) 07:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, Herald, I misread the notification and replied to the wrong msg. This one was for our conversation about Guntur kaaram. Ds1480 (talk) 08:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, obviously. Filmibeat.com is not a reliable source per
WP:ICTFSOURCES. See that table and identify the reliable sources. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Editwarring on 80s and 90s list

@

WP:3RR now. Please be extra careful. Thanks. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you for reaching out. I'm well aware of the three-revert rule. However, I've only reverted twice today, and I've also provided proper reasons for the reverts. I'm open to discussing any concerns you have about the edits and finding a constructive way forward. Tusk001 (talk) 13:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have provided multiple sources now, whats "unreliable" in them? AleksiB 1945 (talk) 14:08, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Tusk. The 3RR is not an arbitrary rule. It doesn't have to be exact three times. If there's a disagreement with the content, you have to discuss it with the editor in their talk page or this talk page. You have already reverted them last week too. So if I were you, I'd discuss it first before any more reverts.
AleksiB, you did a good job adding the list, but as Tusk001 pointed out, the references do not fit the reliability. See
WP:ICTFSOURCES to know which all are accepted. Hence, you can't revert terming it as vandalism. Proper rationale has been given by Tusk001 in edit summary. So please go through that. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Noted. Tusk001 (talk) 14:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Madhura Raja

should we add madhura raja into the list as i found a lot of sources (many of them reliable) claiming that the movie did cross 100 crs. one of them is this one: https://www.sacnilk.com/news/Madhura_Raja_Box_Office_Collection_Day_Wise_Worldwide seems like a pretty credible one as it has mentioned the movie's total box office collection without the inclusion of other non-theatrical revenues like satellite and ott rights. so, yah what are yall opinion on this? Credmaster 20 (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to
WP:ICTFSOURCES to identify reliable sources. Sacnilk.com is not a reliable source. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
@The Herald
what about these sources?
1. https://www.khaleejtimes.com/wknd/bollywood/mammootty-bollywoods-loss
2. https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/malayalam/mohanlal-unveils-first-look-of-unni-mukundan-bruce-lee-6605891/
3. https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/malayalam/mammootty-next-film-title-shylock-shakespeare-5831714/lite/
all claims that the movie grossed over 100 crs Credmaster 20 (talk) 16:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, they look credible too. But have look at the movie's talk page for similar discussions. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2024

Please edit Aadujeevitham Worldwide Gross is now at 155.43 crore. It's the 3rd highest grossing malayalam movie now. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). https://www.koimoi.com/box-office/aadujeevitham-the-goat-life-box-office-collection-day-29-recovers-making-cost-coming-weeks-will-be-exciting-to-watch/ EvieJames (talk) 17:46, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]