Talk:List of incidents at Herschend parks

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Amusement Parks Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image be added to this article. Once the requested image is added, remove the Imageneeded parameter from the {{WikiProject Amusement Parks}} template call on this page to remove this image request.

I thought that Herschend sold its stake in Ride The Ducks to Ripley's. See this article from December 2017. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.199.14.226 (talk) 13:17, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the paragraph about the 1999 Arkansas incident, as all information I could find on it suggests that it is not related to Ride the Ducks or Herschend Entertainment. According to this page, it was owned by White and Yellow Duck Sightseeing Tours, and operated by Land and Lake Tours. Given the somewhat "current event" nature of the article due to the recent incident, I removed the section to prevent misleading readers. If someone can verify that the incident was related and source it, feel free to revert. WikiToaster (talk) 02:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the incident isn't connected to Herschend, it doesn't belong, even if there wasn't a current incident to put the company in the spotlight. Thanks for looking into it! --McDoobAU93 (talk) 02:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As additional details come to light on this incident, I'm starting to wonder if this doesn't merit its own separate article. It reads like the investigation is focusing on the tugboat that was pushing the barge instead of on the duck boat, so this could have additional ramifications. Opinions? --McDoobAU93 (talk) 14:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No need to expand out unless there is significant enough information to warrant a separate article. Use the Great Adventure haunted house fire as a great example of what needs to happen when an article needs to be split off. SpikeJones (talk) 02:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120307182729/http://www.wate.com/Global/story.asp?S=1787851 to http://www.wate.com/Global/story.asp?S=1787851

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A woman is suing Dollywood for $2m claiming spinal cord injuries when riding RiverRush in 2017. Didn't want to update the main article with this information, pending results of the trial. Something to keep an eye on while we wait for further information - https://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2018/06/dollywood_sued_for_2_million_b.html SpikeJones (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]