Talk:List of most expensive divorces

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

George Lucas

The divorce settlement is sealed but most sources put it at $50 million. Some say $35-$50 million. It was a lot because he had to sell off Pixar to keep going. JettaMann (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Keep this list going

Hey,

Wikipedians, this is a dynamic list; let's keep it up-to-date and accurate. Thank you. ProfessorPaul 01:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Another source

The

God save the Queen. ProfessorPaul 02:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Updated for August 2010

Wow! A $750 million divorce! Take care. ProfessorPaul (talk) 04:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rupert Murdoch

Rupert Murdoch's divorce from Anna Mann was formerly listed here as costing him $1.7bn, sourced only to a newspaper column listing it as one of the 'ten most expensive divorces'. An article I just came across questions this valuation, saying he only(!) had to pay around $100m, and specifically claims that our list is inaccurate:[2] Based on that, I've moved it down the list, until we have some better sources that can clear this one up one way or the other. Robofish (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EveryList.xyz

Does not look like a reliable source to me but is used to support four entries in the list. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • I remove entries with this non RS and others sourced only to showbiz gossip sites. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Numbering needed

Those ought to be numbered, like a league-table. Valetude (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to tabelize it, but numbered ranking is not a good idea, as there is no uniform methodology.--Jklamo (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

about sources warning

Any thoughts on the sources warning? It looks like the sources have been pruned if disreputable sources. Any objections to removing that warning? UVemNJvA (talk) 19:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

descending order?

Agree with previous discussion about no natural sort order. Does anyone agree that a roughly descending ordering might help guide the reader to the information of interest expeditiously? UVemNJvA (talk) 18:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]