Talk:List of songs by Taylor Swift

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to List of songs by Taylor Swift (non-admin closure) Colonestarrice (talk) 00:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose the puropse of this list is to focus on what recordings have been released, with popularity (or lack thereof) being irrelevant here. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment If we want to include both recordings and compositions, could we use "List of songs by Taylor Swift"? That way nothing has to be excluded.  Mysterymanblue  07:12, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's a good compromise. I would support the page being moved there as well. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 12:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• @
  ASCAP registrations. Colin M (talk) 23:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • @
    WP:SYNTH territory, as who is to say she wrote those songs? Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 23:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• What about just creating a separate article at List of unreleased songs recorded by Taylor Swift? There's precedent for such lists. See Category:Lists of unreleased songs by recording artists. Colin M (talk) 23:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Colin M: That is a really great option that I hadn't thought of before. There are over 100 unreleased songs, so it would probably overtake the references section (not to mention the main section) and impede on the fact that this list is a featured list. I had originally considered doing an "Unreleased songs" section like what is at List of songs recorded by Ariana Grande, but the songs would have to be recorded for them to be included (and AFAIK there aren't any demos published by reliable sources), so that is why I went the RM route. I think I'll let this RM go on for the next six days, and, based off of the consensus, I will reassess whether the unreleased songs should go in this article or in a separate one. Thanks for the advice! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 00:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate proposal

I suggest moving to List of songs by Taylor Swift and include all songs either written or recorded or both, clearly indicating which is the case. Agree that songs she wrote for others are at least as important as songs by others she has recorded, probably more important even. But more than one list seems undue weight to me.

There is much previous discussion and movement on this! See particularly but not only Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs by Taylor Swift. We need a strong consensus and thorough discussion here in order to get long-term stability. Andrewa (talk) 03:06, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per my comment above.  Mysterymanblue  08:37, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support per my comment above. One question: if this page does get moved, should the headers be "released", "unreleased" and "written for other artists" or "written" and "recorded"? I personally like the former option better, as a lot of the songs overlap (90% of her discography is songs she has both written and recorded, so "Shake It Off" would go into both the "written" and "recorded" sections, for example). Thanks for the alternate proposal! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 11:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would be inclined to have sections rather than one enormous list, although for most things I prefer a single sortable table with a flag column or two. But large tables are a pest to update and this one is already going to be large and likely to grow. Probably the order of the sections would include written. recorded and released first, and unreleased last with subsections. It's good to discuss the format a bit here, in case it calls the whole idea into question. But this discussion can and no doubt will mainly occur after the move if it occurs. Andrewa (talk) 14:59, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Andrewa: I agree that it is good to discuss the format a bit here. I can't visualize your idea in my head. Would you mind doing something like what I've done here? The permalink includes my idea of what the format could be, so if you could give feedback on that as well, that would be great. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 21:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support alternative. Let's keep the broader category of information. BD2412 T 01:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]