Talk:List of support for High Speed 2

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance). Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A discord server with double digit members does NOT warrant a section on a wikipedia page, social media movements you're referring to had thousands of members. Aweymember2 (talk) 19:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This discord server has thousands of supporters, including prominent people in Downing Street, CCHQ, Manchester for the conservative party conference and key MPs in Labour. It has more than enough of a right to be on this wikipedia page. LarryTheCat1 (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has 26 members, it's a minor discord server. Aweymember2 (talk) 19:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am a part of this Discord server. And I can say that your members are completely idiotic to think that you can get away with this. Holy hell, why are you so egotistically entitled to think that your little den of senile, acne-ridden children with the mental aptitude of earthworms can stop HS2 from being shelved? Getsomehelp1962 (talk) 19:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please remain civil @

WP:CIV. Comment on content, not onthe individual. Knitsey (talk) 20:01, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

This seems like a conflict of interest. LarryTheCat1 (talk) 20:12, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any activist inclusion needs to demonstrate notability to be included. You can do this by providing sources of significant coverage of the group. A random Discord group without significant coverage showing notability would not normally warrant inclusion.

Please read the following

WP:RS Knitsey (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

This articulates my point in a way I was unable to - thanks! Aweymember2 (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LarryTheCat1: If there is such support for the group then it would be great if you could demonstrate that with links.

On another note, if you're the person from the server group then you have what we call a conflict of interest. Please read

WP:COI. I will pop a note on your talk page about this. Knitsey (talk) 19:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for your help! LarryTheCat1 (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]