Talk:List of urban agglomerations in Andhra Pradesh

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. India: Andhra Pradesh / Cities / Geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

please do not change the data on Eluru and Anantapur without quoting credible references. If you want to have a discussion regarding the data let's do it here. Srikanth Aviator (talk) 03:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The title is cities and Urban agglomerations are stated. But in

This article does not have Visakhapatnam city or Visakhapatnam district in the list. How can this be possible?? Someone please add Vizag to this article. SriHarsha Bhogi (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a UA.--Vin09 (talk) 05:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070617234445/http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Metadata/Metada.htm to http://censusindia.gov.in/Metadata/Metada.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070617234445/http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Metadata/Metada.htm to http://censusindia.gov.in/Metadata/Metada.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of urban agglomerations in Andhra Pradesh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131126163918/http://gunturcorporation.org/TownPlanning/gos/GO_279_12072012.pdf to http://www.gunturcorporation.org/townplanning/gos/GO_279_12072012.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150617144735/http://apmdp.gov.in/apmdp/pdfs/TOR-25.06.2012.pdf to http://apmdp.gov.in/apmdp/pdfs/TOR-25.06.2012.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The author of this article clearly have a biased view. This should not have been approved by wikipedia at the first place. We trust so much of Wikipedia, and wikipedia doing it this way creates a big doubt on the correctness of its content in all other pages of information. Please rectify the mistake by including Visakhapatnam at its right place. otherwise it is greatest blunders and it creates very doubt on the correctness of information in wikipedia site as a whole. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.238.74.199 (talk) 19:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]