Talk:Longevity

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Longevity Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Longevity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the World's oldest people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LongevityWikipedia:WikiProject LongevityTemplate:WikiProject LongevityLongevity articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. inactive .Ageing and cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Ageing and cultureTemplate:WikiProject Ageing and cultureAgeing and culture articles

Medicine Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

The "Major factors" section summarizes that longevity is based off of genetics and life choices. In the following paragraphs, however, extensive detail is given to genetics while the only contribution to life choices is "diet." I believe that more life choices than just diet contribute to longevity and more information should be added.NoahStubbs (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An uninvolved editor has asked the Arbitration Committee to review whether the

@Thryduulf: The link that you posted seems to be broken now. Can you repair this section link so that it will point to this discussion again? Jarble (talk) 20:17, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is long over and will now be in the arbcom archives somewhere. I don't have time right now to find it, but one of the arbcom clerks (pinging user:Liz and user:L235) will probably be able to assist. Thryduulf (talk) 20:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

ping in reply) 20:50, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

There is an ongoing discussion that implicates this topic. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:41, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• non-sentimentality and anti-sentimentality

Every ambiguous, false, tearful, emotional exaggeration brings about that typically kitsch attitude which could be defined as "sentimentality." Gillo Dorfles.[1]

Analytical thought of the frontal lobe, not emotional drift to the torrent of randomness of the limbic system. Well even statistically countries who have higher iq and relatively lower eq, tend towards longevity. There are facts about it, again and again the same, for so many years.

Please add other longevity factors underneath. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4108:DB00:1832:FC09:ED75:38B5 (talk) 03:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Longevity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101213203112/http://uscnews.usc.edu/health/reaching_toward_the_fountain_of_youth.html to http://uscnews.usc.edu/health/reaching_toward_the_fountain_of_youth.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:11, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Longevity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140729202531/http://www.aihw.gov.au/chronic-diseases/key-indicators/determinants/ to http://www.aihw.gov.au/chronic-diseases/key-indicators/determinants/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aggressive competition and the consequent risk of stress or physical injury, has been theorized to be the reason for gender or sex differences in average longevity, and preliminary findings seem to support that hypothesis: https://phys.org/news/2019-04-turtle-gender-lifespan-differences-due.html

Might this be worth mentioning in the article? Zazpot (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article states ″Developed countries: 77–90 years (e.g. Canada: 81.29 years, 2010 est.)Developing countries: 32–80 years (e.g. Mozambique: 41.37 years, 2010 est.)″ this is wrong.According to the world bank Mozambique had a life expectancy of 54 not 41.37 in 2010,and there is no country on earth in 2010 that had a life expectancy of 32(at least to my knowledge). Furthermore there is no country on earth with a life expectancy of 90 years.

World bank link(https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN?locations=MZ-TD-NG-LS-CF-SS-CI-SO-ML-HK-MO-LI-JP-CA&most_recent_value_desc=true) Roma enjoyer (talk) 05:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]