Talk:Los Angeles Common Council

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Peculiar election result

Regarding the peculiar result of the 1867 election, in which the winners (or perhaps just most of them) were turned out of office after only a few months, well, I checked the microfilm of the Los Angeles Semi-Weekly Daily News for several dates in August 1867 (which is when the Common Council is supposed to have annulled the election), and I found nothing at all reporting on this action. I might note that the newspaper appears to have been more like a "'shopper" than a regular community newspaper, and it is virtually useless in covering city politics of that era. Its columns were filled with pickups from other papers and with propaganda for the Democratic Party of those days (pro-South, anti-Negro). One could conceivably find out more about this election fiasco by delving into the city archives, but of course that would be Original Research. There are no other newspaper files extant in the LAPL for those years. Sincerely,

talk) 07:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Incoming links . . .

All people in the 1850 section checked for incoming links, and links added on target pages.

talk) 06:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

All people in the 1851 section checked for incoming links, and links added on target pages.
talk) 07:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Blue links . . .

I've been linking only the Notable members of the councils. Notability includes being the president of the council as well as all the other ways to get Notable. Non-Notable members shouldn't get links, even red ones, in my opinion. Thank you. Sincerely,

talk) 07:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Non-notable members

These are the names that have been checked with no reliable sources found to demonstrate their notability. Sincerely,

talk) 03:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

A–K

L–Z

This may be the same William P. Lawlor who became a justice of the California Supreme Court, but there are no sources. The only source on his page says he moved to California in 1877, so it is possible he stood for election in Los Angeles in 1878. I am leaving the link to

talk) 19:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Missing year, 1855

The year 1855 is missing. When it is added, all the entries therein should be adjusted to account for any restored info.

talk) 19:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Los Angeles Common Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Los Angeles Common Council. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]