Talk:Low-cost carrier

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2014; 2015; 2017; 2020;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airline project.

Suggested move

I suggest a move to

Low-cost airline. Current title is not bad, but "carrier" is a little vague. cagliost (talk) 14:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply

Archives (Index)
2014 2015 2017 2020
This page is archived by ClueBot III.