Talk:Lucky Brand Jeans

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

this is practically advert for a lesser known brand of clothing, admin, please look at this

Seriously, this article reads like a damn brochure. --69.110.129.109 05:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned it up. there was a disgusting amount of ad-speak in here.

I agree that there was a lot of ad-speak in the previous page, but there was a fair amount of legitimate information that was lost in the edit. It would be nice if someone with knowledge of this company's stores and products (I don't have much or I'd do it) could re-edit, and bring back some of the information without reintroducing the marketing stuff. The truth is, in this case I think the marketing language is actually the lesser of two evils when compared with the dearth of information in the new version... (Sorry, forgot to sign the first time) Sharding 00:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tried not to delete any information really relevant but it was mostly just about the kind of jeans they had and what it felt like to shop there. not wikipedia material at all. there was no real information deleted, which I am sure there is out there. (Siebenviertel 21:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]

To be fair the type of jeans and the 'shopping experience', or maybe intended shopping experience (though this is still obviously subjective to some degree) is exactly the sort of information I want if that's what separates this brand from any other--Voltaire53 18:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Lucky Me part has only been introduced recently... (last year or so) It was lucky you always though. 72.174.31.77 (talk) 08:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]