Talk:Luther rose

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Lutheranism Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Lutheranism (assessed as High-importance). Heraldry and vexillology Luther rose is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

When I looked up "Luther rose," I discovered there were two overlapping articles entitled "Luther's seal" and "Lutheran seal". A Google search revealed twice as many hits for "Luther rose" as for "Luther's seal", and seven times as many hits for "Luther rose" as for "Lutheran seal". I merged the two articles and moved them here. This is my first major edit, so it didn't come out right the first time. Tweeq 15:53, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Should discuss occurences of Luther rose in heraldry. --Daniel C. Boyer 20:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The picture of the Luther rose is not correct here. The rose should be a simple rose. (Terot 14:39, 11 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I have now changed the image of luther rose to the Lutheranism template. This rose is simple and more correct (although the leaves might not be green). (Terot (talk) 22:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Someone has vandalized the page by replacing the rose image with that of a seal. I'm a newbie so don't know how to fix it...Niederbrach (talk) 05:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms of Ramsau and Greifenstein do not bear Luther rose. These are regular roses.--90.190.139.232 (talk) 10:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted a link on the Luther rose article as it no longer existed.

TheInformativePanda (talk) 00:22, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]