Talk:Métro Léger de Charleroi

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: Rapid transit Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit. Belgium Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

By British, German and Dutch standards, Anderleus is an outlying small town NOT a suburb. See the difference betwixt Gilly (a true suburb-lying neighbourhood) and Anderleus (which is far far far more outlying and CLEARLY so)

"consisting of a loop line around central Charleroi and two branches towards the suburbs of Gilly and Anderlues" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.75.50 (talk) 16:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From the web images the Charleroi metro seems mostly forlorn and unfared. Seems like the aftermath of some kind of fascist mind-set. Far too grandiose. As if it was planned to be filled with the offspring of some kind of 'breeding-camps'. Fascism of the aforesaid kind seems alive but not particualrly well in Waloonia. Truly, to the keen eye, Waloonia smatches far too much of the F-word. So, should the Charleroi metro be linked to a wiki on grandoism and the suchlike? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.75.50 (talk) 16:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080128001101/http://www.trams-trolleybus.be:80/metro0.html to http://www.trams-trolleybus.be/metro0.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140219003710/http://www.metrocarolo.be/cms/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=120%3Agosselies to http://www.metrocarolo.be/cms/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=120%3Agosselies
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140504085155/http://metrocharleroi.over-blog.com/5-index.html to http://metrocharleroi.over-blog.com/5-index.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.trams-trolleybus.be/metro0.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The map shown only has M1/M2 lines drawn on it, rather than all four that are in service. However the data for the map uses Wikidata Q1682845, which does describe the whole network, so I've updated the main relation in OSM to have this Wikidata reference. Pmberry (talk) 10:30, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above changes appear to have made the map render correctly now. Pmberry (talk) 10:09, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stations - 3 unused stations - the map shows 4

2607:FB91:148F:647:349D:C71D:239D:9208 (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]