Talk:Macfie

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anthroponymy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I noticed a broken link on the

I found mention of MacFie as an Armigerous clan. I think the current Macfie page should be moved to the correct spelling, then maybe someone will see it and add to it. (-- unsigned by Rincewind42)

Hmmm. Definitely a strange spelling. Yep. Let's move it to McPhee where it belongs. -- Derek Ross | Talk 06:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ho, hum, MacFie or McPhee? They may be different and in this case I would have thought the former. Ben MacDui Talk 08:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it to

MacFie and tided up the language; I cannot vouch for the content. It would ideally have a stub mark, but every other clan I checked on had a reasonable amount of information displayed and not being familiar with stubs I left it alone. Awake ye MacPhees! Ben MacDui Talk 09:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I see now that to be consistent with the Scottish clans category it should be 'Clan MacFie'. However, now that it sticks out like a sore thumb on the category page perhaps someone with the requisite knowledge will move it along. Ben MacDui Talk 09:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC) (All the above copied to MacFie talk page.)[reply]

I think the T&L connection should be elucidated Why were they concerned? What was the conncetion between T&L and MacFie's Treacle? Citation? Wwwhatsup 08:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]