Talk:Magnezone

	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Pokémon This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles

Is Jibacoil japanese or english?—The preceding

• It's the romanization of the Japanese name.
  -- M C Y 1008 23:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that Jibacoil IS the Japanese name... Im probably wrong...

unsigned comment was added by 86.148.112.16 (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

• The Japanese name is ジバコイル. Jibacoil is the romanization of that.
  -- M C Y 1008 18:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, it's called Magnufo alrightダイノーズ 16:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. Not alright. PROVE IT. We don’t put rumors and wishful thinking in the Wikipedia. Google searches for “Magnufo” only bring up a bunch of forum posts where people suggest/predict it as the English name. But as any idiot can see, that does not make it even close to being official. You keep saying Nintendo has announced it. If that’s the case, prove it. Provide a link, or a picture, or cite a magazine, or SOMETHING. --WikidSmaht (talk) 20:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with WikidSmaht! Please cite your sources or stop vandalising Jibacoil's article!Floramage! 21:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• sigh* Cite sources! Until then, it will be considered vandalism.LuGiADude 11:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seribii revealed early this morning that this creature has been dubbed Magnezone. So, let's get moving again!! —The preceding

• Shouldn't we treat it like speculation? BlackxxJapan 09:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • True in theory, but whenever Seribii reveals a new name, we change these pages to the same name on the side of caution (after all, they've never been wrong yet!) - NP Chilla 09:44, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not true, NP.

v^_^v) 13:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Actually, Neorant's page HAS been changed, so this should be also , 86.137.2.183 14:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. You see, Jeske, every other article has had its name changed to fit with the Seribii revelations when appropriate; this is because Mantyke, Chatot, Buizel, Electivire and the starters were predicted absolutely. You're right about consensus, but it DOES look odd when you think that this is the only article where the name hasn't changed!! - NP Chilla 18:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's 'cause we haven't gotten about to reverting it yet. x.x —M_C_Y_1008 (^talk/_contribs) 20:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All names are now released.--User:Rat235478683--

Rat, please refrain from breaking the flow. And, by WHOM are they released? PokeExperto has been

v^_^v) 22:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

And I just moved my example

v^_^v) 21:48, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

http://www.pokebeach.com/index.php

This may be a long shot, but I guess this pretty much confirms all of the other 4th gen Pokemon names. Why would someone go so far as to make up a large list of names? Seems like a huge waste of time to me. NeoSeifer

Until a reliable source confirms that it is Magnezone, this stays at Jibacoil. Serebii doesn't exactly have a good rep with WP:PCP at the moment. Funpika 18:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, off to work on nearly every other 4th-gen Pokemon article? 81.132.183.220 20:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

naw, i think we should turn it to magnezone. i already did, and serebii still has to be proven wrong about the name.--chaosemeraldking 20:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but I won't be happy until they are proven RIGHT. That is what matters. My logic is "wrong until proven right". Nintendo should make an offical confirmation before this article is switched to Magnezone (providing it is the name). Funpika 21:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Chaosemeraldking, you need to bone up on

v^_^v) 21:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

The reported name should still be mentioned, though. It is an easily verifyable fact that the name has been REPORTED (though not confirmed). 68.34.228.213 22:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.pokemonelite2000.com/n07_0319_dpcard008lg.jpg Here's your reliable source! Move to Magnezone, plz. Feats-O-Strength 00:04, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cards can easily be faked. Got a link to the page that hosts the image (rather than the image itself)? -

v^_^v) 13:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

http://www.pokemonelite2000.com/ Right on the front page....Just know I'm not taking any side, it's just more information that needs to be represented.—ウルタプ 13:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen the images, but it's hard to tell if someone PhotoShopped them. This is why I prefer examing print cards to see if they're fakes. I can't tell. -

v^_^v) 13:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

http://pokebeach.com/ has pictures of the new Diamond and Pearl cards that were shown in a press release. One of the cards is Magnezone. Zaver 19:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong, Jeske? Are you in denial or something? This card (and the other ones, as well) aren't fake. Magnezone is this Pokemon's name. NeoSeifer

What is the source for the evolutionary method? Unless a reliable english source has provided information on the Diamond/Pearl games (which, not being out yet, is impossible), there is no way for that information to be offical (serebii.net and other sites that translate information and, in fact, were likely the sources of most information on the Pokemon articles being unverified) or verified. Unless, of course, such knowledge is common (Rarecoil could evolve into Jibacoil through the stated method while Magneton evolves into 'Magnezone' through a new stone programmed into the english version only), anything can be denied. In fact, according to the

Ah, so the

v^_^v) 17:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

As do all wars. In fact, my own father is a large war movie fan, and would love to watch a video on the Battle of the Bulge. I, however,

unsigned comment was added by Gigawolf1 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC).[reply

]