Talk:Mahalakshmi Temple, Mumbai

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai / Geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been marked as needing an infobox. This article was last assessed in February 2021. Trains Low‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Hinduism Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

There seems to be some confusion/disagreement. A book cited in the article (Bombay Place Names and Street Names) names one Dhanji Dadaji as the man who ordered the construction, and that it was completed in 1831. The account that relates the construction of the temple with that of Hornby Vellard, on the other hand, indicates 1785. The Hornby Vellard page cites an article from the Mumbai Mirror that is now a dead link. Perhaps a small shrine was built at that time and later expanded? Could residents of Mumbai clarify? AnshumanF (talk) 18:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I too believe the same. It must have been a small shrine and then was built properly after few years. That's my opinion! -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:57, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]