Talk:Mandatory retirement

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Discrimination Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Why 'Retirement Age' redirects here? pfff... Wikipedia is more shitty each day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoygan!! (talk • contribs) 17:25, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article previously read that judges cannot be removed in Australia because of the seperation of powers doctrine. This is not entirely correct - s72 of Australia's Constitution provides:

The Justices of the High Court and of the other courts created by the Parliament: (i) shall be appointed by the Governor‑General in Council; (ii) shall not be removed except by the Governor‑General in Council, on an address from both Houses of the Parliament in the same session, praying for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity;

This applies to courts created by the Federal Parliament... I think there are similar provisions for State-created courts, in their respective Constitutions. LudBob 05:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100423032659/http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca:80/eng/lp/spila/clli/eslc/19Mandatory_Retirement.shtml to http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/lp/spila/clli/eslc/19Mandatory_Retirement.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified 2 external links on Mandatory retirement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924090528/http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/download/fuernkranz/lazear_mandatory_retirement.pdf to http://www.oeaw.ac.at/vid/download/fuernkranz/lazear_mandatory_retirement.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100402202906/http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/court-cour/sys/index-eng.asp to http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/court-cour/sys/index-eng.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing an unsourced subsection under Religion titled "Anglican Communion." A quick google search revealed that there is no uniformity among Anglican provinces or dioceses. For example, England is 70 ^[1], US is 72 ^[2], and at least some parts of Canada are 65 ^[3]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Novanglusva (talk • contribs) 18:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See table and map in:

• Mandatory retirement. Ballotpedia.

There are many more states listed there than are currently listed in the Wikipedia article. --Timeshifter (talk) 11:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]