Talk:Media in Chicago

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Chicago Mid‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Notes

I assume "community" means in some sense "specialist", so weeklys like the Reader don't belong there.--Jaibe 10:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears this is terribly out of date, since the Red Streak is still listed in the Daily papers section. The Red Streak has been out of print since, what, late 2005? Putting the Red Streak in the Defunct category. CaponeX (talk) 16:09, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Made minor edits and clean-ups... corrected radio and TV call letters, newspaper names, added one or two to each category. See history. CaponeX (talk) 13:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There seem to be a number of radio stations missing (including quite a few that I regularly listen to). I would suggest at least that someone adds a link to radio-locator.com (who say they get most of their info from the FCC), something like this: http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/locate?select=city&city=60601 ... any objections? 146.180.106.230 (talk) 15:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

The citation from Nielsen in the first sentence is a dead link, and it looks like a subscription is needed to access the current info. Does anyone know of a way to get a proper citation? Thanks. --Funandtrvl (talk) 18:19, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Media in Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061104174730/http://www.cityofchicago.org/FilmOffice/ to http://www.cityofchicago.org/filmoffice/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]