Talk:Medicine at Midnight

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Albums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles Rock music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/01/arts/music/foo-fighters-dave-grohl.html Sergecross73 msg me 19:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creating template: Template:Medicine at Midnight tracks

So a few things that need deciding:

1. Is it a single? (The only source presented on an edit summary did not directly state this.
2. If it was a single, but was only released in a single, non-major market, does it need to be listed on the infobox.
3. If we list it in the infobox, does it need some context? Like an "(Italy only)" note or something?

We need to come to a

• Against inclusion - it's unsourced and even if it is sourced, I don't think it's helpful to clutter the infobox with songs that largely aren't singles in most regions. It also doesn't have its own article, so it's not aiding in navigation either. Sergecross73 msg me 12:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Against inclusion - These days now that we no longer have physical singles and it is all mostly about streaming/downloading and what gets released to radio, it appears to have only been released to radio in Italy which makes it a pretty low key release and does not make it an actual single, more just an album track that is being played on the radio. Secondly, I don't think it conforms to: Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs#Notability to have it's own article which gives further support to it not being included as a single.QuintusPetillius (talk) 16:55, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, is not the first time we use EarOne.it as a source for Italian radio dates (see

Did you even bother to read the comments above? Or the edit summarties? I feel like it's explained very well. As mentioned before, your source literally doesn't call it a single, it just says radio stations are playing it. If you do t stop, the page will be locked from editing. You need a

WP:CONSENSUS to make changes to Wikipedia when people oppose your edits. You have 2 editors opposing you. Sergecross73 msg me 20:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Bah, you're completely crazy because for some articles we use this site without any problem but now, for unknown reasons, this time the SAME EXACT SOURCE is not valid. What can I say? Remove the source in every page, like the one I mentioned above (which are there since many months/years, but seems no one cares). --84.221.116.62 (talk) 09:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to follow the rules of Wikipedia:Consensus.QuintusPetillius (talk) 11:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe read

WP:OSE too. Just because someone did it some way once doesn't mean were forever required to do it the same way here today. Sergecross73 msg me 12:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]