Talk:Menhaden

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fishes Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Fisheries and Fishing High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Tzjones (talk · contribs) / Menhaden Menhaden This user has declared a connection. (COI declared on user page here)

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2020 and 10 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cpetey4578, CrusadeFish.

Above undated message substituted from

pornnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn I would think it should be mentioned. Also, the article states that there are only two harvesters of menhaden in the U.S., but it says they only operate in the gulf coast. How then can menhaden be the most harvested fish in the chesapeake bay? I just think it should be clarified whether Omega Protein Corporation and Daybrook fisheries are the only two harvesters of menhaden. I would imagine there would be many more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.161.181.83 (talk) 21:40, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I grew up on the water and bunker was considered by everyone as the best bait for lobster pots and bluefish. Prolly would be considered the best bait for other things if anyone I knew tried. The tradition was that the very oily flesh would send oil through the water a long distance and this was irresistible to lobsters and bluefish. I know from running lobster pots as a teenager that bunker was the best bait, though tinned cat food was very close. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.29.199 (talk) 12:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to H. Bruce Franklin, Omega Protein had, in 2007, a virtual monopoly on the menhaden market, and kept a nominal competitor in existence for its own convenience (fewer reports to file).I have been unable to confirm that Daybrook is viable, or that it has folded. Can anyone? Should we state that OP has a real monopoly? Donfbreed2 (talk) 10:22, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tzjones, an editor who works for Saving Seafood (see the editor's user page), a fishing industry trade organization, recently joined WP and has been directly editing this and other articles. I have placed a COI tag on this article. Once an independent editor has reviewed changes made by Tzjones for NPOV and sourcing, the tag can be removed. Please make a note here when you do that. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 01:06, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

just reviewed this. other editors reviewed Tzjones edits as they came in. Content seems OK, so i removed the COI tag. Jytdog (talk) 12:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Menhaden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080426202039/http://www.chesapeakebay.net/atlanticmenhadenmanagement.aspx?menuitem=15378 to http://www.chesapeakebay.net/atlanticmenhadenmanagement.aspx?menuitem=15378
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080602180209/http://www.dnr.state.md.us/fisheries/fishfacts/menhaden.asp to http://www.dnr.state.md.us/fisheries/fishfacts/menhaden.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080304110838/http://www.vims.edu/myco/FAQ.html to http://www.vims.edu/myco/FAQ.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110406232623/http://www.keepamericafishing.org/action/article_ne/managing_menhaden to http://www.keepamericafishing.org/action/article_ne/managing_menhaden
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.asmfc.org/speciesDocuments/menhaden/reports/stockAssessments/2006StockAssessmentReport.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Menhaden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509072047/http://www.menhaden.org/management_conflict.htm to http://www.menhaden.org/management_conflict.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst the article talks about the positives of omega fatty acids, and healthiness with regards to bllod presure, in Menhaden oil, it omits to mention the very high levels of cholesterol present in the oil, and therefore it is very detrimental to heart health! 27.125.174.91 (talk) 08:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]