Talk:Milton Keynes City Council

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

Is in the 'Centre for Cities' report, if someone else has time to do it. I don't at the moment. --

My thanks to whoever updated the article with that info. --

talk) 20:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The barrister's opinion that planning conditions were missed as a result of "human error", there was "no untoward conduct." says pretty clearly to me that the word "scandal" is not appropriate. Had he found corruption or "gross dereliction of duty", then "scandal" would indeed be appropriate. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 09:48, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JMF That's a fair point to make. I initially thought that "scandal" sounded better because "controversy" sounded like a personifying term to me. Although I'm sure many of the residents certainly view it as a scandal, hence the local election results in the Newport Pagnell South Ward. Anonymous MK2006 (talk) 11:23, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]