Talk:Mind of a Man

Mind of a Man has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 17, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Game shows Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Television game shows task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Mind of a Man/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Johanna (talk · contribs) 16:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grabbing this for a review. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 16:36, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Put some stuff from the Production and Reception sections in the lead.

•  Done --
  talk) 21:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

•  Done --
  talk) 21:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• talk) 21:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

•  Done --
  talk) 22:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

•  Done --
  talk) 22:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

•  Done --
  talk) 22:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I follow GSN and know that average primetime ratings are between 350,000 and 500,000 viewers. The sources, I'd argue, are the ratings for other shows. Similar to the plot section of an article on a TV episode, I'm not sure an IC is really a viable option here, given it's unlikely a news article will say something like, "GSN's average ratings are..." --
  talk) 21:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• That's how I've done it for other GSN GAs. It provides a link to the old site while noting that the link is no longer "live." --
  talk) 21:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

@

talk) 02:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@

talk) 22:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Bentvfan54321: I'm satisfied with everything now. Pass. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214)^{talk to me!}_{see my work} 01:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (

   lists

   ):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: