Talk:Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Originally

"Originally patients were classified as having sepsis or the sepsis syndrome. This resulted in two concepts: the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).[1]"

Lacking any medical background, it's hard to see how the original classification of patients as having sepsis "resulted in two concepts" -65.87.169.2 22:55, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Oh man! I'm so sorry! I was editing the gut hypothesis section only, and the rest of the article somehow got deleted! I don't even know how it happened! Once again, this was purely an accident, and I apologise profusely.

would like to talk to you! 09:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Broken Reference Link

Reference #1 no longer produces any information regarding the subject ("The product you requested is unavailable"). As this is the basis for citations a-l, this page or relevant (preferably several) sources of backup information need to be re/located asap. CrashCart9 (talk) 19:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots

|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051107202505/http://www.lww.com:80/product/?0-7817-3548-3 to http://www.lww.com/product/?0-7817-3548-3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 09:14, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of single primary reference?

The second paragraph in the "Cause" section appears to be nothing more than a summary of a single primary reference; a single research paper that identified IL-10 as a major factor in "sepsis-induced multiple organ injury." Although the reliance on a single primary reference is problematic, if we wanted to keep this, surely we could distill it into a single sentence? Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 13:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the paragraph entirely; see

WP:MEDRS. Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 13:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

signs and symptoms blank

section header exists but nothing underneath it. we should add relevant info to the section or remove it. Mihir.pethe1 (talk) 03:15, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]