Talk:Museum of Osteology

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Museums Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Death Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. project's importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to The field of anatomy.

Oklahoma Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Bone Educator (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. SkeletonsRCool (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

This article seems like a fluffy piece, about a non-notable museum run by a company with a similar adverty tone. It hasn't even opened yet! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that this is a "non-notable" museum. I am interested in science and nature, osteology in particular, and I think there are many others like me that would like to know more about this museum. If anyone would like to expand on the "fluff" I contributed, I welcome it. Sklmsta (talk) 15:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend that you read Wikipedia's

conflict of interest guidelines. As the article stands at the moment it is likely to be deleted. - Nick Thorne ^talk 22:32, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

All references are now cited. I propose removing the tag. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.200.200.26 (talk) 14:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not tagged for

notability, these issues have not been addressed, so it is inappropriate for either of the tags to be removed. - Nick Thorne ^talk 22:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

At least one, and possibly more than one account that have contributed to this article appear to have a personal or professional relationship with the museum. Archer1234 (talk) 18:40, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]