Talk:Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Freedom of speech Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. U.S. Supreme Court cases This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. Film Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list for Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Ohio: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2015-01-09 Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Verify Ohio free speech mirrored Federal first amendment; provide examples of other direct results of the ruling - other state censorship boards - find interesting examples; find out when the Ohio censorship board went away; provide context about how movies were pretty new, and discuss level of popularity; add Supreme Court infobox.

Edited the title of "subsequent events" to say "overturned". Subsequent events is rather ambiguous and should be more specific as this section could be easily overlooked even though it is a very signficant piece of this case's history. There may be a more standard way to do this, but I could not find a reference to one within supreme court rulings on wikipedia. Jesse Crouch (talk) 22:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]