Talk:Nandi (Hinduism)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Reorganisation

It was monolithic article and I split into sections. We still need to merge duplicate information a little more. I added a gaint lepakshi nandi picture. I also removed "the largest" claim, until we see the height of each nandi from some sources. I believe either Tanjore or Lepakshi is biggest, not the bangalore nandi. Mlpkr 13:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nandi or Nandin?

The bull's name is Nandin, according to the Sanskrit dictionary, not Nandi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.212.111.58 (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube link

The youtube video was posted which makes no contribution to the article.

<--Hk-->

Born clad in diamonds

The source for this statement is not only dubious, it is arcane and not readily available, a book (vanity) published in 2009 that sells for over $200 only on Amazon, that cites no sources of its own other than recursive Hindu scripture. I have been unable to find any other references to support the statement. I suspect that the origin of this statement is closely linked to the semi-literal translation of the name "Śilāda" (शिलाद) being "[he who is a/the] stone-eater", as Śilāda is claimed in nearly every source to be the father of Nandi. Diamonds seem a natural extension of the properties of stones, erroneously being applied in deference to the more-celebrated offspring who is the vahana of Ganesha. Ore no unko desu ka? (talk) 12:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indus Valley

I am removing this paragraph from History and legends section:

The worship of Shiva and Nandi can even be traced back to the

Mohenjo daro and Harappa, which led to conclusion of the researchers, that Nandi worship has been a long standing tradition for many thousands of years.[1]

There is literally no connection with the Pashupati imagery of IVC and bulls. Not a single seated Yogic-figure seal from Harappan sites have bulls accompanying it. The most famous

reliable source. Just because anyone can edit wiki doesn’t mean any book can be used as source. ChandlerMinh (talk) 13:44, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]