Talk:National League (English football)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
The Nationwide Conference is the highest level of non-league football (i.e. outside of the FA Premier League and the Football League) in the United Kingdom. -- sorry, make that "in England" :) The rest of us may take some issue if you leave it as "UK"! Admittedly the name of the current sponsors causes a bit of confusion.... Arwel 13:40, 29 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Yes.. of course — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mintguy (talk • contribs) 13:53, 29 August 2003 (UTC)
Legal name issue
Someone along the way deleted my reference to the Conference's unsponsored official/legal name being "Conference League".This may no longer be the case,but I'm pretty sure it has been the case at some point up until recently,and should be stuck in somwhere.--L.E./12.144.5.2/[email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.144.5.2 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 18 April 2004 (UTC)
Conference North and South pages
The more I think about it, the harder it is for me to think of a reason for developing separate pages for Conference North and Conference South. What information would go on these pages that wouldn't be on the Football Conference page? I can see a reason to keep them as pointers to the main Football Conference page, but I can't see a reason to point to them from the Football Conference page. Does anyone have a vision for how a Conference North/South page should look and what info it should include - distinct from the Football Conference page - that would make it worthwhile developing? I'd be interested to know. I should perhaps say that my doubts on this matter don't just apply to the Conference, but to any of the Division pages of the various Leagues. Am I missing something, or just being realistic? - Madw 00:15, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
My opinion is that we should have a similar system to how
SimonMayer 00:33, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
My question is more, what content would/should the Conference National/North/South pages have as they are developed? Would they have any unique content, or just repeat what was on the Football Conference page? And if they just repeat stuff, then what's the point? Taking the Division 1, 2, & 3 pages as an example, they include virtually no unique information - it is all on The Football League page - and the one or two things that are mentioned there could/should be in the League page too, or the
- I expect that as Conference North and Conference South develop a history,they will get more unique content that is most appropriate to specific articles about them.The same with all manner of divisions within leagues.Overview pages for the leagues,and more particular information on division pages.--L.E./12.144.5.2/[email protected]
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.144.5.2 (talk • contribs) 21:36, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
Past Winners
Why have the past winners been moved back here from
- A simple check and you would have noticed that they still are on the Conference National page. - Madw15:17, Jun 2, 2004 (UTC)
- I know that, but why are they on this page as well?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.193.160 (talk • contribs) 11:22, 3 June 2004 (UTC)
- What's the problem with having the winners of the Football Conference listed on the Football Conference page? I don't understand the issue here... - Madw 14:04, Jun 3, 2004 (UTC)
How does the system work?
Something I'd like to know and what I think would be good on the article is a explanation of how having automatic promotions from lower leagues works with regards to north/south premier and the conferance. I know that its flexible who goes where but how is it decided when teams are moved, i.e. WI 2 south coast teams are promoted but 2 far north teams are relegated- do they move borderline teams about that finished mid table, force the northern teams to play in the southern league, etc...?--Josquius 20:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Correction to the number of teams that have won the Conference twice and been promoted to the Football League
In the 'History' section, the article says that only two teams (Kidderminster Harriers and Macclesfield Town) that have won the Conference twice have been promoted to the Football League. There are actually three, Maidstone United won the Conference twice and on the second occastion this led to promotion to the Football League. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.115.208 (talk • contribs) 12:16, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BlueSquare Leagues.gif
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:31, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Professional League?
A while ago I created an article on conference player Jack Midson. This was deleted on the grounds that the conf is not a fully professional league. There is no doubt that the conference this season is not fully professional. However, in recent seasons all the teams in it have been professional. Surely then, for those seasons, the conf was, to the letter of the law, a professional league. It is my belief that some serious consideration should be given to the notability guidelines regarding conference players. This is, i can assure everyone not just because my artice was deleted but an issue I think needs some discussion. I await the usual backlash. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferdinand4321 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
- why is/was this particular player notable? There must be many hundreds of professional players/ex-players in the Conference, I don't image anyone is going to write up all of them. As a rule of thumb I would suggest that a player needs to have been (a) professional (b) have done something notable at club level, e.g. most appearances/goals Chrismorey (talk) 01:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Redirect
I created a redirect from The Football Conference to Football Conference. This is similar for the redirect from The Premier League to Premier League. phreakydancin (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Sponsors
The Conference has had a number of sponsors in its history, including to my recollection GM Vauxhall and Blue Square. Could someone knowledgeable please cover this, otherwise it gives the misleading impression that Skrill has always sponsored it? I suggest a new section Chrismorey (talk) 01:45, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 2 June 2015
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to National League (English football). Jenks24 (talk) 15:48, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. Del♉sion23 (talk) 16:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support - to match change in name. GiantSnowman 17:36, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support the current location should be replaced by the disambiguation page; the generic topic of a conference in football is extremely likely. -- 70.51.46.11 (talk) 04:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- "National League (English football)" is a better title. The current title should still be converted to a dab page or a concept page (My IP has rotated) -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - Would Super Nintendo Chalmers (talk) 09:53, 3 June 2015 (UTC)]
- Support - Change after confirming name change. Make sure article has the reason and citation for said change. Jrcrin001 (talk) 01:33, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - I agree a move is necessary and that National League is the correct terminology, but as the fifth teir league in England, I'm not sure it should be called Bhutan National League, Korea National League, Myanmar National League although I appreciate there is no hard and fast rule, so National League (English football) would be equally acceptable to me. Fenix down (talk) 11:36, 10 June 2015 (UTC)]
- Comment - just to note that I would be equally happy with National League (English football) if association football is deemed too ambiguous. Del♉sion23 (talk) 12:35, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Rreagan007 (talk) 01:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support Super Nintendo Chalmers and Fenix quite rightly point out, the proposed title is rather ambiguous given the number of other National Leagues in football. Number 57 08:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)]
- Support National League (English football) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Isthmian League
The History section gives the impression that promotion from the Isthmian League did not begin until 2004. In fact it began in 1985, when Wycombe Wanderers were promoted and Yeovil Town were relegated. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Attendance figures
Currently the See also section's entire content is:
- "List of attendance figures at domestic professional sports leagues — the National League's attendance in a worldwide context".
However, the linked article does not contain the relevant statistics (its 'lowest' English Association Football entry being EFL League Two), nor are they given anywhere in this article. If anyone can add them in either article it would be welcome, but if not this section needs to be revised.
One source for some of the figures for 2017–18 is here, but I'm not sure if this is a
Darlington
Hello! I noticed the lack of Darlington in the “Former EFL Clubs” section of the article, and want to add them, but I’m wondering- do Darlington count as the same club that competed in the EFL, or are they more suited to the “Phoenix Clubs” section? The distinction between the old and new Darlington isn’t all that clear, as a matter of fact the Wikipedia page on the club appears to list them as the same beast. Just wondering where they might be best suited to. 2A00:23C5:D083:DC01:71A6:B9FB:EEC2:A9FC (talk) 11:01, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Promotion & relegation: lack of clarity
The section about the promotion and relegation structure is a disgrace, written as if meant for people who already know well that subject. Exactly who gets promoted and who gets relegated needs to be stated at the beginning, absolutely clearly, and in as few words as possible. -The Gnome (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)