Talk:Natural History (magazine)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Magazines Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Environment Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New here - sorry if the form is bad.

I just received a e-mail from Natural History magazine, with their explination of the suspension. Am I allowed to insert it in the article, or is that "original research"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.56.39.210 (talk) 01:39, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I used to read NH when I was a kid, just saw it at the news-stand yesterday. Not as thick as it used to be. These are hard times for many magazines. I can't seem to find the circulation numbers for this magazine. Useful information to put in the right-hand box of summary facts, don't you think? 208.185.160.194 (talk) 14:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]