Talk:Ned Kelly (2003 film)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
It's quite unforunate some people regard this movie as a bomb; I thought it was really good. Perhaps due to the fact that it played in about 5 theatres in the whole country makes people think it wasn't successful, as I don't remember it coming to ANY theatre in my area.
Fair use rationale for Image:Ned Kelly 2003 movie.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Accuracy
How historically accurate is it? Badagnani (talk) 02:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- This movie attempts to re-write history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.54.73 (talk) 13:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Discrepancy regarding earnings
Under 'Reception' the world-wide earnings are said to be about $6 million, but under 'Box Office', it is claimed that nationally the film grossed over $8 million. Obviously, the national earnings can't be greater than the world-wide earnings. Box Office Mojo (linked to in the 'Reception' section) states 'Domestic Total as of Apr. 11, 2004: $86,959'. This suggests that the quoted national Box office figure is inflated by a factor of 100. Smcg8374 02:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC) I've deleted the 'Box Office' section and incorporated the corrected domestic total into 'Reception'. Smcg8374 11:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ned Kelly (2003 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090521082343/http://www.newsweekly.com.au/articles/2003apr19_ned.html to http://www.newsweekly.com.au/articles/2003apr19_ned.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)