Talk:Ned Kelly (2003 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Untitled

It's quite unforunate some people regard this movie as a bomb; I thought it was really good. Perhaps due to the fact that it played in about 5 theatres in the whole country makes people think it wasn't successful, as I don't remember it coming to ANY theatre in my area.

Morhange 21:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ned Kelly 2003 movie.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 19:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Accuracy

How historically accurate is it? Badagnani (talk) 02:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This movie attempts to re-write history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.54.73 (talk) 13:02, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepancy regarding earnings

Under 'Reception' the world-wide earnings are said to be about $6 million, but under 'Box Office', it is claimed that nationally the film grossed over $8 million. Obviously, the national earnings can't be greater than the world-wide earnings. Box Office Mojo (linked to in the 'Reception' section) states 'Domestic Total as of Apr. 11, 2004: $86,959'. This suggests that the quoted national Box office figure is inflated by a factor of 100. Smcg8374 02:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC) I've deleted the 'Box Office' section and incorporated the corrected domestic total into 'Reception'. Smcg8374 11:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ned Kelly (2003 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]