Talk:Nemicolopterus

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Amphibians and Reptiles: Pterosaurs Mid‑importance Nemicolopterus is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Pterosaurs task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Palaeontology: Pterosaurs Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Pterosaurs task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

I don't know the family for the taxobox. If anyone finds it please add it. Thanks. Grundle2600 (talk) 19:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nemicolopterus is described as a basal member of the Dsungaripteroidea.--MWAK (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Grundle2600 (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But Dinoguy is right: it is here essentially used as a clade concept. --MWAK (talk) 19:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right. In all our other articles we're using Unwin's superfamilies/clades. Kellner takes the traditional superfamilies and uses them in a completely different way, as nested sequence leading up to the azhdarchs. Pterodactyloidea contains Dsungaripteroidea contains Ornithocheiroidea. I prefer Unwin's method as it preserved the original usage and doesn't shatter every ICZN rule in the book if you transliterate the phylogeny into a taxonomy. ;) You can see both versions here

List of pterosaur classifications. Dinoguy2 (talk) 22:27, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks everyone! Grundle2600 (talk) 04:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

	An image used in this article, File:Pterodactyl-380x540.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 20:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Nemicolopterus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080311232842/http://palaeo.jconway.co.uk/object.php?title=Nemicolopterus_crypticus_Skeletal&objectid=78 to http://palaeo.jconway.co.uk/object.php?title=Nemicolopterus_crypticus_Skeletal&objectid=78

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]