Talk:No Mistakes

hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

GA Review

This review is
transcluded from Talk:No Mistakes/GA1
. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:

talk · contribs) 23:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm excited and honored to review your article. Just give me a bit to review it.

talk) 23:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Good Article
review progress box

WP:CV
()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. free or tagged images
() 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the
Good Article criteria. Criteria marked
are unassessed

Infoxbox and lead

Looks good

Background

"and he contributed" → "and contributed"
"had previously featured" → "was previously featured"

Done for the above --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Compostion and lyrics

Looks good

Release and promotion

This could maybe be added to 'Background' because of how short it is.

Not done I understand it is short but four sentences can be its own section as long as that's not loads of separate sections, plus it deals with the subjects of both release and promotion --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

Looks good

Commercial performance and appearances in media

"the song entered the US Billboard Hot 100 at number 36" → ""No Mistakes" debuted at number 36 on the US Billboard Hot 100"

Done --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"The song also debuted on the US Streaming Songs chart at number 17" → "The song also entered the US Streaming Songs, peaking at number 17"

Done with changes --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Credits and personnel

Looks good

Charts

Looks good

References

Copyvio score looks good at 17.4%
MOS:CAPS
issue on Ref 9

Not done as that is how Jay-Z is stylized at times --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Looks good

Final comments and verdict

talk) 02:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

DarklyShadows Have responded and thanks for the review, able to pass now? --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 09:05, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

DarklyShadows That's awesome, pleasure working with you on this! --Kyle Peake (talk) 09:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

talk) 09:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 07:23, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

that before Kanye West sampled "Hey Young World" by Slick Rick on a track in 2018, his frequent collaborator Jay-Z had sampled it back in 2002?

Improved to Good Article status by Kyle Peake (talk). Self-nominated at 16:24, 9 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral : Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: New article, long enough, well-referenced, no copy-vios detected, hook cited-inline / interesting, no QPQ needed as this is the nominator’s second nomination. Amazing work on the article. Great to do this review Kyle Peake. Good to go! Ashley yoursmile! 08:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ashleyyoursmile Thanks a lot for the DYK review after I did one of your GAs not long ago, I'm very happy to know this passed after my hard work. --Kyle Peake (talk) 09:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]