Talk:No New Friends (DJ Khaled song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Apteva (talk) 03:09, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No New Friends → No New Friends (SFTB Remix) – This is the official name of the song. It says this on iTunes. Billboard Man (talk) 12:44, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not really the official name. Koala15 (talk) 14:10, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yes it is is. Here's an iTunes link to prove it. 24.164.159.145 (talk) 14:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment On Wikipedia if a song is a "Remix" we never put it in the title. Koala15 (talk) 14:28, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Remix does not go in the title of the song as "No New Friends" is the official title. See these sources here here and here. It is hardly even a remix at that since unless I am mistaken the beat and everything is completely different from
message me! 14:59, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Oppose: If you look at the picture in the article, the font size is tiny for the parenthetical and the parentheses are missing entirely and the font color is different (separating the extra phrase from the title as shown to the reader). No one seems likely to use the parenthetical phrase as part of the title in conversational use. Also the parenthesis looks like Wikipedia disambiguation, which seems somewhat confusing. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:35, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not familiar with song, but Remix would not be used because the article is about a song - whether the notable version is a remix or not is irrelevant because each song only gets one article - see
WP:NSONGS. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review
. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on No New Friends. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://webcitation.org/6KZCYW3lf to http://www.allaccess.com/top40-rhythmic/future-releases

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for discussion

Koala15, this is a note asking you to come to discuss the matter afore mentioned (reversion without explanation). BornAnomaly 12:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Koala15, I've asked twice that you please discuss this matter. I've reverted your reversion as instructed. If you revert without responding here, then I'm going to have to file a complaint against you at ANI for disruptive editing by reverting without discussing. BornAnomaly 15:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)