This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
He seems more like a Brit born in India during the Raj to me. Sumahoy 01:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tough call. In the article text, I would certainly think "athlete from India" preferable to "Indian athlete", or the like, in relevant places; categories, of course, aren't so flexible. [1] uses "Anglo Indian" and [2] uses "Indian" to describe him. But yes, he was a Brit born in India. -- Jonel | Speak 03:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it is a tough call at all. He was British, but he represented India because he was living there. The sources are both Indian, and it's understandable that India would be keen to claim him, as they didn't have another individual medallist for generations. But in those days, pretty much anyone could represent anyone at the Olympics. The "French" team in the only ever Olympic cricket match in 1900 consisted entirely of British players. It is extremely unlikely that he would have answered "Indian" if asked his nationality, because the British in India just didn't. Luwilt (talk) 09:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think calling him an Indian athlete is fine, according to the usage of the time. British people who had returned from India - often employees of the East India Company - were often referred to as "Indians" when back in England. I seem to remember there's an example of such usage in Thackeray. The British in India also tended to call other Indians by more specific terms, like Hindus or Muslims, or Bengalis, &c. Lachrie (talk) 19:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pritchard was British
He was British and represented GB, as Ian Buchanan showed. IOC needs to wake up.
Pretty much every source at the internet i can find (except wp) gives norman pritchards birth date at June 23 1875. This article gives no sources at all. Does anybody know more? --A bougainvillea preguiçosa (talk) 08:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
