Talk:Norwegian Public Safety Network

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Telecommunications Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Enforcement Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. project's importance scale .

	Norway
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

This review is

Talk:Norwegian Public Safety Radio/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 12:07, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (

   lists

   ):

   operator centrals" What does this mean?

   the health sector's communication centrals. Again. Do you mean control centres?

   Health workers will therefore be taking the network into use after the police and fire departments in Follo and Østfold, and not until May 2010 Needs update as this was nearly a year ago.

   ''The alarm center for the fire departments in Østfold and Follo took the system into use in June. June of which year?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to

   reliable sources): c (OR

   ):

   References check out. I assume good faith for those in Norwegian. No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Good coverage, no unnecessary trivia.

4. It follows the
   neutral point of view
   policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have

   suitable captions

   ):

   I am puzzled by the license for File:Oslo Akershus VW Ambulanse in new colors - 2007.04.03.jpg, which does not seem appropriate. I have left a note at the relevant Commons noticeboard. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:41, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

   Ok, Comons is happy with it so that is fine. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for issues above to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:41, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

   OK, my concerns have been addressed, I am happy to list this. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk)

   Thanks for taking the time to review the article. I've fixed the prose issues, trying to find or add more specific terms. As for the image issue, it seems from the linked discussion that the license is fine. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

According to dNk, the correct english name is Norwegian Public Safety Network and not -Radio. Should the article be renamed? -PeterFisk (talk) 05:49, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]