Talk:Nothing (film)

	the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

Film: Canadian

	guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:NothingFilm.jpg

fair use

.
Please go to
Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
talk) 00:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Production

The "production" part of the article reads like a film student's review, and has nothing to do with production. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.221.8.219 (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Misogyny?

I'm not sure about this part, as the film doesn't seem to suggest that all women are like this, and while there are no strong and positive female characters in it, the downfall of Andrew and David are partially caused (it seems) by their own neuroses and inability to relate to the outside world. For example, were David less naive, he probably wouldn't have been set-up as he was and had Andrew been able to socialize with people in a regular fashion, the girl probably wouldn't have acted as she did either. It also seems a bit silly to include it, as it isn't really relevant to the prevailing philosophy, so I think I will remove it, if there are no objections. 134.117.251.5 (talk) 16:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I support the removal, and I actually removed the whole "Production" section since it was original research. Content in the article should be backed by reliable sources. Erik (talk | contribs) 17:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nothing (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515093217/http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=3706 to http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=3706

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nothing_(film)&oldid=1201881670"