Talk:Now You Know (Desperate Housewives)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good articleNow You Know (Desperate Housewives) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
December 6, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Untitled

Mary Alices Narraration at the end has to be fixed,the spelling is horrible and hardly readable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.243.51.209 (talk) 16:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Once again - are there any valid sources for the details in this article? Or is it based upon non-encyclopedic spoiler sites? Pjär80 10:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inadequately sourced stuff and unsourced stuff

Due to

tripod.com. This episode airs in four weeks time, and meanwhile the production company or broadcasters may give some verifiable information about it, and we can document that. --Tony Sidaway 16:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Thanx :) Pjär80 08:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Girlswatchkatherine.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Girlswatchkatherine.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DH 4-01.png

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NowYouKnow496.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 17:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:NowYouKnow497.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 21:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:NowYouKnow497.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 08:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk · contribs) 15:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I shall conduct this review. -- Matthew RD 15:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Reasonable well written?:  Pass. Readable, I understand what is being said even though I have never seen the show. The odd issue I rectified myself.
  2. Verifiability: One issue.
  3. Broadness in coverage:  Pass
  4. Neutral:  Pass.
  5. Stability:  Pass. No recent editing conflicts
  6. Images:  Pass. One non-free image with a fair use rationale (though in prose rather than in a template) and license, also two free images.

Well, I would be happy to promote this for GA. However, there is just one thing preventing me from passing; blogcritics is a, well, a blog. -- Matthew RD 22:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for dealing with the one issue. I will now pass the article. Nice work. -- Matthew RD 20:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Now You Know (Desperate Housewives). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 13:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Now You Know (Desperate Housewives). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]