Talk:Now You Know (Desperate Housewives)
Now You Know (Desperate Housewives) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
Mary Alices Narraration at the end has to be fixed,the spelling is horrible and hardly readable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.243.51.209 (talk) 16:04, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Once again - are there any valid sources for the details in this article? Or is it based upon non-encyclopedic spoiler sites? Pjär80 10:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Inadequately sourced stuff and unsourced stuff
Due to
- Thanx :) Pjär80 08:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Girlswatchkatherine.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Girlswatchkatherine.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:DH 4-01.png
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 03:59, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:NowYouKnow496.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:NowYouKnow497.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Fair use rationale for Image:NowYouKnow497.jpg
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Now You Know (Desperate Housewives)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk · contribs) 15:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I shall conduct this review. -- Matthew RD 15:34, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- Reasonable well written?: ✓ Pass. Readable, I understand what is being said even though I have never seen the show. The odd issue I rectified myself.
- Verifiability: One issue.
- Broadness in coverage: ✓ Pass
- Neutral: ✓ Pass.
- Stability: ✓ Pass. No recent editing conflicts
- Images: ✓ Pass. One non-free image with a fair use rationale (though in prose rather than in a template) and license, also two free images.
Well, I would be happy to promote this for GA. However, there is just one thing preventing me from passing; blogcritics is a, well, a blog. -- Matthew RD 22:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thank for dealing with the one issue. I will now pass the article. Nice work. -- Matthew RD 20:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Now You Know (Desperate Housewives). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://goldderbyforums.latimes.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1106078764/m/340102161
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Now You Know (Desperate Housewives). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080530205941/http://www.parade.com/articles/editions/2008/edition_04-27-2008/In_Step_With...Dana_Delany to http://www.parade.com/articles/editions/2008/edition_04-27-2008/In_Step_With...Dana_Delany
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110501042023/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=100207_05 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=100207_05
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101009173735/http://www.tvguide.com/roush/desperate-housewives-20500.aspx to http://www.tvguide.com/roush/desperate-housewives-20500.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)