Talk:Occupational apartheid

This page was proposed for deletion by RHaworth (talk · contribs) on 5 October 2008 with the comment:
neologism
It was contested by Occupational scientist (talk · contribs) on 2008-10-06

Please can you bare with me while I try to extend this page? I am not "activity_analyser" ... There are going to be a large group of Occupational Therapists editing all things related to occupational therapy on wikipedia over the next few weeks...I am just one of those...Thank you (Occupational scientist (talk) 21:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Can you explain your prediction that there will be a large group of occupational therapists editing over the next few weeks? Themfromspace (talk) 02:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It is likely that there will be a significant number of OT contributors over the next few weeks due to an event called OT wikiflash. You can find details of it here at http://otwikiflash.net We would ask that any deletions are delayed please, as we want to encourage as much content as possible in order to convey the range and depth of OT to students, service users and clinicians amongst others. A few members of our community will keep an overall eye on things and we trust that over the next few weeks this will come good. Sarah Bodell.

While I appreciate your attempts to help wikipedia in your fields of research and believe that this is done in good-faith, I have posted a heads-up notice on

WP:COI to make sure your contributions do not become suspect or wind up deleted. Thank you. Themfromspace (talk) 21:33, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Occupational scientist, are you editing naked? OK, I will happily bare with you. I might stop harassing this article if you could manage to provide a couple of external links to show that this term has any degree of widespread use. See also Talk:Therapeutic activity. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 12:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]