Talk:Ontario Peninsula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Too focused on demographics

Most of the article is three long tables of the most populous entities in the Ontario Peninsula. While I believe that the tables belong in the article, I think that it should go into detail about other aspects of the peninsula, like the economy, that the article currently does not describe. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 00:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a real place

This is not a real place. No one defines this ambiguous area as an entity. Even a google search brings up nothing. The author of this article seems to have entirely made it up. This article is of almost zero value and should be deleted. 70.51.84.62 (talk) 02:32, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@70.51.84.62: I conducted a Google search, and I did find sites that mention the Ontario Peninsula by that name. In my opinion, the lack of more sites is not evidence that the Ontario Peninsula is not a real place but instead evidence that it is not universally called the Ontario Peninsula, in which case redirects from alternate names would be in order. Also, I find it implausible that an article about a made-up subject could have accumulated links from 102 other Wikipedia articles. If you believe that the article should be deleted, you may propose it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, but I would oppose that. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 02:56, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If "Ontario Peninsula" is used for the geographic region of southern ON directly bounded by the lakes or rivers, the nomenclature isn't particularly common. The writing is pretty basic, all of the information provided is already covered by the articles for Southern Ontario, and its subregions. Frankly this seems like an extremely arbitrary designation considering the land that stretches between Georgian Bay and the northern part of Lake Ontario isn't included.

This is arguably one of the worst articles on Wikipedia. It is completely fabricated and provides nothing of value except some out of date statistics. How this article hasn’t been deleted is beyond me. 2605:8D80:546:E10:DBF:128A:261E:84BF (talk) 17:43, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This article has only three references, none of which use the phrase "Ontario Peninsula" or relate primarily to it. I have added {{synthesis}} and {{neologism}} hatnotes. If someone adds citations to Wikipedia:Reliable sources that use and explain the term "Ontario Peninsula", then these hatnotes can be removed. jnestorius(talk) 14:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is certainly a real place, as simple searches of books and academic papers will confirm, but it is a geological subdivision, not a climatic or demographic one, so the article should be updated to reflect that.
Phil Bridger (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
]