Talk:OpenNIC

Internet Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

A few minutes of web searches yield the following sources, listed by URI or (in one case) scholarship citation. Each comes with a parenthetical summary of the type of source and what the source has to say about OpenNIC.

• http://www.itworld.com/article/2726824/networking-hardware/icann-domains--mia--opennic-be-a--pirate.html (news: OpenNIC responsiveness contrasted with ICANN)
• https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/21/many-sites-including-twitter-and-spotify-suffering-outage/ (news: improved name resolution reliability with OpenNIC, at least sometimes)
• https://techcrunch.com/2016/07/15/circumvent-social-media-block/ (news: censorship-resilience through alternate domain resolution systems)
• http://www.coindesk.com/trend-micro-report-finds-criminals-unlikely-abuse-namecoin/ (news: censorship-resilience through alternate name resolution systems)
• https://books.google.com/books?id=GmRPJGaTr8gC&pg=PT113&dq="OpenNIC"&sa=X#q="OpenNIC" (book: censorship-resilience through alternate name resolution systems)
• Faisca, Jose G., and Jose Q. Rogado. "Personal cloud interoperability." World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), 2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on A. IEEE, 2016. (scholarship: options for name resolution)
• https://www.trendmicro.com.au/cloud-content/us/pdfs/security-intelligence/white-papers/wp-bitcoin-domains.pdf (scholarship: alternate name resolution systems, particularly .bit domains)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Apotheon (talk • contribs) 00:23, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

should we add information about what registry manages each tld? Mkwia (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly add another section instead of adding more columns to the TLD table: Tier 1 Servers, being another table that lists the hostnames, IP addresses, and TLDs each root server operates. All info can be found here, although I'm not entirely sure of its "notability" for that info to be added to Wikipedia. -- Jonah Aragon ^|Talk| 02:12, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Bakhtiyar Nazim:, thanks for adding .sky and .ness. I could not find any source for OpenNIC peering these TLDs. Could you verify this and add them to the Peering agreements table along with Date introduced? Thanks, Mkwia (talk) 11:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mkwia, yes I'm on it, I will complete entries in the next couple of days Bakhtiyar Nazim (talk) 20:34, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone has some info about 'New Nations' (new-nations.net) owners? Because their website resolves a white blank (empty) page, and it looks like their project is being (or it was) discontinued. I truly don't know if their DNS (or OpenNIC's DNS) are still resolving their own TLD domains (.uu, .ti, .te, and .ku). More info about their status is needed. 186.12.32.155 (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is labelled "active" in the table but isn't currently responding. Any other recent experience? Michaelgraaf (talk) 10:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It does not appear to be active, but there is also no official news stating that it is inactive or discontinued. CapnPhantasm (talk) 23:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]