This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
In my view this article passes the seven criteria for a good article, i.e. it is well-written, factually accurate, broad, neutrally written, stable, well-referenced, and has a sufficient number of images. Maybe the only problem is with the grammair, a native speaker should check it, as there seem to be some orthography errors, and some typos. Also, I'm not sure the "fortifications of vergas" note should remain, probably it would be better to part put its content in the main article and part it could be used for an article yet to be created on Vergas. Ciao,--Aldux 12:13, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the
Good article. I made several minor corrections, but there were no major problems with the article. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have edited the article history to reflect this review. Regards, --Nehrams2020 03:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Fact box
Hi. I'm new to all this, but I've spotted a problem in the fact box (right terminology?). Under the sections on strengths and casualties, it appears that the Maniots were fighting themselves instead of the Ottomans and Egyptians. Happy Editing! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbeas5 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Those are the name of sources, not combatants. Dimadick (talk) 07:16, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Map mismatch
It is a shame that the map included in this article has virtually none of the place names actually mentioned in the article. Can someone do better? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mukogodo (talk • contribs) 16:46, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, the map is *disorienting* when combined with the text. First, the map has different place names from those mentioned in the text. "Jíthio" is a stretch for the mentioned "Gytheio". I'm assuming the "Dirú" is the mentioned "Diro"/"Diros". Second, many of the mentioned places are not on the map! Where is "Vergas"? Apparently somewhere to the northwest, much nearer to Kalamata. Where are:
Kariopoli
Polytsaravo
Almiro
Missolonghi
Messenia
Karytainia
Of course it never helps when text uses multiple variations of names, but when the visual aid has none of those names it is worse. Shenme (talk) 02:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]