Talk:Outline of Morocco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconGeography High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconMorocco Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Help expand the project:

You can help! يمكنكم أن تساهموا


Tips for developing country outlines

Instructions for developing country outlines is located at Wikipedia:Outlines (while that section is complete, the page is a draft, and will be moved to the Wikipedia namespace when completed). The Transhumanist    21:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A note concerning redlinks...

Many of the entries (and their links) are standard across all of the country outlines, to aid readers, especially young readers, in comparing countries to each other.

So if this country doesn't have any of a particular entry, like navies, please don't delete the entry. Instead, complete it with "none" (and a brief explanation as to why, for example, "- x is a landlocked country with no ports"). If the explanation exists in an article on Wikipedia, then click on the redlink and create a redirect to that location. See

WP:Section linking, and Help:Section#Section_linking
.

Standard redlinks (article names) were also chosen based on how country coverage tipically expands. This makes the standard names for these subtopics widely available and easily accessible. So please do not remove those redlinks, for they will turn blue eventually. In the meantime, they can be redirected to the section of whatever article has the relevant information, if any. See

.

Thank you.

The Transhumanist    21:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: To discuss the standard design of the country outlines, or of outlines in general, do so on the

Outline of knowledge WikiProject talk page
.

Guidelines for outlines

Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.

Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.

The Transhumanist    21:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please check and fix the government section

The government section needs to be checked for accuracy. The initial data placed in the government branches sections was generated by template, and the data didn't fit all countries.

So those sections need to be looked over, and fixed if needed.

Please help.

Thank you.

The Transhumanist    21:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: If you'd like to help out with other tasks concerning

Wikipedia's Outline of knowledge
, please drop me a note on my talk page.

Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines

"Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation. The Transhumanist 23:58, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed status regarding Western Sahara

This talk page appears to be dead for the last 5 and a half years and doesn't warrant much confidence but we'll quickly address this anyway. Morocco claims the entirety of the Western Sahara territory, of which it de-facto controls between 2/3's-4/5's. With the current maps shown, the (relatively higher) claims are completely disregarded and given the other party (Polisario Front) the ultimate preferential treatment by showing they territory is completely separate. I say "higher" with regards to Morocco's claims given that it controls (or administers) the majority of the territory, as well as all of its coast, large/main cities and most of its resources. There was also no reason to remove the disputed border with "Mauritania", given that the fact Morocco borders Mauritania in the first place is disputed (by the Polisario) and does have a Morocco-Mauritania border frontier at Guerguerat in the far southwest. Western Sahara should be highlighted because it is a disputed territory, as all disputed territories (especially controlled by a country) are always highlighted and acknowledged. 100.14.89.197 (talk) 15:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Morocco and not "Morocco and what it claims" or "Morocco and what it illegally occupies". Morocco doesn't have a border with Mauritania and it never had. It southern border is with Western Sahara, a non-self-governing territory that is partly occupied by it and partly liberated by the SADR (this issue is treated in depth in the Western Sahara article). M.Bitton (talk) 15:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Population 41.121.57.56 (talk) 17:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]